Lining Four Thunder Plagiarized Nike? Why Is Lining Always Involved In Plagiarism Scandals?

Since Lining's (b ng) series of running shoes and the two pairs of running shoes have met with everyone, the doubts about the "plagiarism" have not stopped.
Everyone compares the shoes to Nike's NEXT% running shoes. These shoes are Nike's running shoes for professional runners.
So did Lining's series of running shoes really plagiarize?
First of all, we analyze the field of running shoes. Lining's two "flying power" and "Tianma" racing shoes are mainly for the Professional Marathon market. The selling price is 2099 yuan and 1299 yuan respectively, which is considered as a more high-end and professional sports running shoes. This positioning is very similar to Nike's NEXT%, and it also has the suspicion of imitation and "competition" at the price.
And from a number of aspects, Lining's flying electric running shoes are quite similar to NEXT% in appearance color matching, vamp material, Logo orientation and shoe sole appearance, so many people see that these two pairs of shoes affirm Lining's plagiarism.
What is the truth? In fact, in the sports shoes industry, many shoe elements and techniques are shared. Lining may look at the double NEXT%, but it needs to integrate Lining's own technology and technology into the soles. However, each brand's own technology is different. It's the same appearance, but the details and the ways to deal with it may not be the same. For this electric power running shoes and Nike NEXT% running shoes bump face, dog uncle thinks Lining is too hot to rub too much.
Why does uncle dog use the word "rub heat"? Lining did learn a lot about the appearance, shape and color of NEXT% in flying electric running shoes, but technology is after all its own, created through the same appearance, but the inside is not exactly the same, so it can not be called "complete plagiarism". Although there are plagiarism elements in it, Lining is not not using his own technology and understanding of running shoes.
Like the popular voice and video and the content of self media copy and planning, many uploads and authors may just keep up the outline of previous popular stories to fill their core with their own ability and create new content. Gou Shu believes that these things are not undesirable, but need to use more creative power to break the "framework" that the former has laid down for you, so that they can "replace". This is the most perfect and ideal state of creation.
Unfortunately, Lining's pair of electric running shoes did not break the frame drawn by the former Nike NEXT%, and was considered completely plagiarized because of the excessive appearance. Gou Shu thinks that this can only be regarded as the failure of Lining himself to resist the erosion of a rice. After all, even a matching color is as hard as others. It is really a bit speechless. It is also a reflection of overcoming this disadvantage and giving you a lesson.
In addition, Lining is often caught in the "plagiarizing door", and there are many shoes for plagiarism. For example, recently released 8 of the city and the current popular AJ34.
The city 8 and AJ34 are very similar two pairs of shoes, the key is that when aj34 just popped out, Lining designer put the Po of these shoes out, why exposure in advance is afraid that they will be plagiarized after being taken out again, so it can be said that it was also produced at the same time.
And Lining's other "Cosmic Dust" (cosmic dust) is also accused of plagiarizing Adidas's PROPHERE.
In fact, careful observation and understanding of these two pairs of shoes, we can give vent to the details of the two pairs of shoes are totally different, saying that plagiarism can only be said that Lining copied a look. Rubbing the heat of this pair of shoes, I want to do a wave of marketing.
But why has Lining been reduced to a casual pair of shoes that have been condemned and plagiarized? The reason is that Lining has so many times to learn from his appearance. The similar appearance and the impressive technology always make it a plagiarism. For example, before the Ace 2, uncle dog thought that this ADIDAS is too hot for the sky and feet. It is not a basketball shoe in itself. Why should we learn others' bottom?
Last but not least, in fact, in the shoes like Lining's plagiarism, many shoes look just alike in appearance, and the upper and lower details of shoes and technology are very different. Dog uncle felt really strange that Lining was too eager to make progress and didn't express more of his own characteristics. He just followed the fashion. This is what Lining needs to pay attention to and improve. From these things, we can see some truth: no matter what, we must have our own characteristics and technology. Otherwise, how can we survive in this era of copying copy?