Home >

Cases Judged By The Court For Being Cheated Into "Shoemaker"

2020/9/21 18:19:00 0

Fried Shoes

In recent years, "stir fry shoes hot" quietly popular, under the label of "limited edition", some shoes have been fried to tens of thousands of yuan per pair. Some lawless elements saw the "business opportunities" and cheated on them. In a short month, they cheated more than 300000 yuan from several "shoe frying" lovers.

Recently, the Pudong New Area People's court made a public trial of this case. The court sentenced the defendant Yu to five years' imprisonment and a fine of ¥ 30000 for fraud.

The prosecution accused Yu of cheating more than 300000 yuan from the end of March to April 2020 by faking chat records and instigating others to pretend to be sellers by falsely claiming that he had Adidas, Nike and other limited edition shoes for sale.

On April 29, Yu was arrested by the public security organs, and truthfully confessed the above facts after arriving at the case.

According to the relevant person in charge of Pudong court, the victims in this case are mainly "post-95" and "Post-00", and most of them are high school students or college students. Among them, a classmate surnamed Ren is not yet 18 years old and is currently studying in senior one.

Yu has been engaged in the "fried shoes" business for 4 or 5 years. Before that, it has been able to deliver goods normally. Because of the loss in operation, the capital chain is broken. In order to cover up the fact that he was unable to deliver goods, Yu instructed others to disguise himself as his family, and then let "Shangjia" falsely claimed that he had goods in his hand, thus constantly asking customers to delay delivery.

Yu Mou, after Yu Mou's deceitful act, has constituted the crime of deceiving others and taking possession of the truth illegally. After Yu arrived at the case, he could truthfully confess his crime, and pleaded guilty and was given a lighter punishment according to law. Accordingly, the court made the above judgment.

"Fried shoes" fraud is not an example

Someone didn't buy a pair of real shoes for 1.35 million!

In recent years, the use of "hot shoes" to implement fraud is not an example.

From May to July 2019, college student Huang Wei (pseudonym) was cheated more than 1.35 million yuan by Yan Qiang (pseudonym), a 20-year-old boy from Tai'an, Shandong Province, from May to July, 2019. He not only did not buy a pair of real shoes, but also fell into the debt chase of customers.

On March 12, 2020, the people's Procuratorate of Huqiu District, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, prosecuted Yan Qiang, a criminal suspect, for suspected fraud.

In addition, according to the surging news, in March 2020, Bi made use of the psychology of "shoe speculators" to rush to buy limited edition basketball shoes, and built a wechat shoe selling group, defrauding others to buy shoes of more than 70000 yuan in total. Although the fraud was successful, he turned himself in at Wangtai police station of Huangdao Public Security Bureau on April 17.

At present, Bi has been taken criminal coercive measures according to law.



  • Related reading

Jordan Sports Trademark Case Lost In The Final Trial

Law lecture hall
|
2020/9/7 14:00:00
110

Yuexiu Police Destroyed "Fake Brand" Clothing Dens And Seized More Than 16000 Pieces Of Goods

Law lecture hall
|
2020/9/7 13:55:00
2

Standard Quality: Zara Has Been On The Blacklist For Three Consecutive Years

Law lecture hall
|
2020/9/7 12:06:00
2

Shanghai'S 330 Million Counterfeit LEGO Case Sentenced To Six Years' Fine Of 90 Million

Law lecture hall
|
2020/9/4 19:57:00
1

Infringement Case: Shaolin Temple And SEMA Clothing Have Launched Legal Action

Law lecture hall
|
2020/9/3 10:25:00
102
Read the next article

Barometer Of Boss Of Clothing Business District In Zhengzhou Railway Station

A depressing summer has passed. After the half year financial statements were released, more than 10000 clothing owners in Zhengzhou Railway Station clothing business circle were in a bad mood